| Publishing Coach Weekly |
| Page: Self-Publisher-or-Mainstream-Publisher |
Publishing Tip
by Diane Eble
Most people, when they think of publishing a book, automatically want to get published by a mainstream publisher. The kind who will pay you to publish your book, as well as pay the upfront publishing costs.
There are definitely advantages to being published by mainstream publishers. However, there are downsides as well. It really all comes down to what your goals are in getting published. Then you can figure out which path is best for you.
There are trade-offs with either choice, and typically the advantages of one are the downsides of the other. For instance, when you self-publish, you can get your book out quickly. That's a disadvantage to mainstream publishing--it often takes a lot of time to find a literary agent and publisher. What you give up for in control with a mainstream publisher, you gain in a professionally done package. Keep this in mind as you read on.
Let's take a look at some of the advantages to each kind of publishing.
Advantages of Self-Publishing
In some instances, self-publishing is the better route. Consider self-publishing if:
The downsides of self-publishing are the upsides of mainstream publishing.
However, know that there will still be costs involved, mostly in terms of marketing your book. While some publishers will still give you some marketing at launch time, the success of your book is up to you. If you don't actively promote it, the publisher will soon put your book out of print.
Part of the reason for that is the sheer number of books being published (something like 180,000 per year). Media folks need some way of culling out the best from the second-best. Mainstream-published books generally are better written, better edited, and better packaged. The media who review books knows this.
One important thing to know about seeking a mainstream publisher: It can take a long time before your book gets published. If you want a mainstream publisher, you absolutely must have an outstanding book proposal to attract a literary agent and then a publisher.
If you have the luxury of time, have a burning desire to be published by a mainstream publisher, are willing to devote yourself to "being an author" which means building and maintaining a platform, and don't need to depend on a book as a main income generator (royalties alone seldom make any author rich), then go for mainstream publishing.
Publishing is undergoing huge changes, fueled by changes in technology. With print-on-demand technology being used by all publishers, and with all the changes happening in the publishing industry, the lines between mainstream and self-published books are blurring.
So, though many in the media will not look at a self-published book, it often has more to do with the fact that so many self-published books don't look as professionally packaged as mainstream books. If your book looks just as good as any you'd find in a bookstore, you overcome that hurdle. If you have an interesting idea, a platform (as in, website and some kind of demonstrable media exposure), and an interesting hook--they will overlook how your book was published.
I know it sounds like I'm contradicting myself, but the bottom line is: What you really need is a great idea, an audience, and a well-packaged book. By well-packaged book I mean: arresting title, professional-looking cover, interior design (most authors overlook this crucial factor, and their books stand out as shoddy because of it).
Mianstream publishers specializing in making sure the package is as attractive as can be. But if you want to self-publish, you can make your book look as good as any mainstream book, if you find true pros and are willing to pay them. I know several authors who have done so successfully, fiction and nonfiction.
Again, it all comes down to: Why do you want to publish a book? The answer to that question gives you the lens to focus on the right choice for you.
|